Welcome-BRI/IMCF Forum-Educational Boards
March 30, 2017, 10:31:41 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Our next Yeshiva (school of instruction) for 2016 is being held in the Northern Rivers NSW on Shabbat April 1st 2017. We look forward to meeting with all who are able to attend here with us.
 
We now are seeking a deeper understanding of the biblical revelation as the Rebbe toils to educate believers in Yeshua into a deeper knowledge that is revealed through the work of the Biblical Research Institute the educational arm of the International Messianic Community of Faith restoring and publishing the gospel at this pertinent time in world history.You're welcome to join us.

Please email us if you would like to attend at:
info@biblicalresearchinstitute.com.au

Our Mission statement:
"Proclaiming the Way of God for All Seekers of Truth as Expressed in First Century Jewish Thoughtform."
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Expositions on the Gospel of Thomas  (Read 1281 times)
admin
Administrator
Jr. Member
*****
Posts: 102


« on: February 19, 2015, 12:04:13 AM »

BRI CENTRE FOR CONTINUING BIBLICAL EDUCATION

CAUTION: BRI Yeshiva notes are not available to the general public. They are not for distribution. They are not for reproduction. The notes may also bear little or no resemblance to the actual audio or video recorded BRI/IMCF Yeshiva lecture.
Copyright © BRI/IMCF 1981, 2010, 2015 All Rights Reserved Worldwide by Les Aron Gosling, Messianic lecturer (BRI/IMCF)

EXPOSITIONS ON THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS

Background [1]
The Agrapha of Christ
by
Les Aron Gosling, Messianic Rebbe


“Although the fringes of the emerging canon remained unsettled for generations, a high degree of unanimity concerning the greater part of the New Testament was attained among the very diverse and scattered congregations of believers not only throughout the Mediterranean world, but also over an area extending from Britain to Mesopotamia” - Bruce Metzger


My purpose in creating this new series of expositions on the Gospel of Thomas is not to rehearse at length what others have postulated as to the books origins, nor to extrapolate on the finer details of the 114 sayings attributed to Yeshua in relation to the same or near-identical sayings found in the four canonical Gospels. These, and associated technical factors, can be accessed in any of the many books and scholarly works available to the public in libraries (and of course even on the Internet, the highway of plagiarism). For me to pursue the technical side of Thomas would be entirely redundant and highly repetitious.

Having said this, allow me a moment to grant an easy overview of the apocryphal book.

In the late nineteenth century, in 1897 to be exact, three tattered texts of an unknown Greek ms [manuscript] or mss [manuscripts] which contained what appeared to be original sayings of Yeshua, were discovered in Oxyrhynchus in Egypt. A little later, in 1903, two more fragments came to light in the same immediate region. Scholars dated them from circa 200-250 CE. Then, in 1905, yet another textual fragment of similar sayings came to light. Scholars determined that this latter text predated the others. While the source was unknown these previously unknown sayings of Yeshua were regarded simply as Logia Iesu. (Please note “IesuNOT “Iesus”!)
 
In 1945 a collection of Gnostic mss were discovered at Nag Hammadi in Upper Egypt, and among them was a Coptic papyrus document entitled The Gospel of Thomas. Scholars were astonished to find the source of the previously unearthed fragmentary sayings of Yeshua in this long-lost “Gospel.” This Coptic version dates from about 340 CE. Within its pages we find memories of certain Jewish-Christian traditions which resurfaced, remarkably, in the 14th century Zohar and associated teachings of the Kabbalah.

Why were these writings spirited away and buried? For one very good reason: the Gnostic Gospels (along with the Thomas list of “Yeshua Sayings”) were hidden on account of the pastoral letter of Athanasius in the latter half of the fourth century (367 CE) which declared Gnostic material heretical. By hiding these documents it was hoped that both the scrolls, and the adherents who used them and considered them to be sacred Scripture, would escape the sword. This was the period in which the Church, now the official religion of the Roman Empire and having gained official status, began to “purge” and “cleanse itself” of the outer fringes of (that which was seen to be) a lunatic “Christianity” (Ian Wilson, Jesus: The Evidence, 1984, 24).

Intriguingly, the Coptic ms is not an exact representation of the Greek fragments, and the sayings are all ordered differently in one fragment – these facts alone reveal (among other things) that the Gospel of Thomas had undergone a series of revisions, and intimated also that its popularity was such that it is likely a number of translations and editions were widespread among the believers who subscribed to Thomas's particular form of Christianity – not just in Egypt but elsewhere. But, and this is most enlightening, while the Gospel was located among Gnostic works the Gospel of Thomas cannot be classified as one of them. It is distinctly “Jewish-Christian,” and while it is apparent that some of its sayings have been “overworked” by later Gnostic hands (and the tampering, while slight, is very evident) it remains essentially an original reflection of thinking that dates to about the middle of the first century.

According to the general opinion of a majority of scholars the original Gospel of Thomas had to have originated prior to the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans. This is what makes this Gospel so vitally important to our understanding and growth in the knowledge of the life and times of Our Lord Yeshua.

Let me say this as well. The Gospel of Thomas is not really a “Gospel” at all in the sense of the four Gospels which we locate in the NT codex, for it is just a list of 114 sayings (and composites of multiple sayings) attributed to Our Lord Yeshua which take the form of answers to questions asked by his disciples and they are listed with no rhyme or reason in a confused jumble of annotations that defy any resemblance of order. Thomas consists of “sayings” (or logia) of Yeshua and short dialogues attributed to him. Most of the sayings of Yeshua in Thomas can be located in the Synoptics (Matthew, Mark and Luke) and in John, while others were not known until its discovery. There are no special titles attributed to Yeshua, and no account of his crucifixion and resurrection. Most of the speech attributed to Yeshua is overwhelmingly concerned with the mysterious “Kingdom of God” or “Kingdom of Heaven.” Professor Elaine Pagels believes that Thomas suggests other dimensions of meaning other than that which is read on the surface of the fragmented document (The Gnostic Gospels, 1979, xiii). Likewise Professor Helmut Koestler of Harvard University postulates that the Thomas document (although compiled circa 140 CE) may include authentic sayings of Yeshua older than the Gospels of the NT canon “possibly as early as the second half of the first century” (meaning circa 50-100 CE) (Introduction to the Gospel of Thomas, The Nag Hammadi Library, 117).

THE ORAL TRADITION – THE “YESHUA SAID” LIST

We are informed by Luke that at the time of his writing there were innumerable sources of the life and sayings of the Messiah in circulation and he apparently drew upon a wide volume of source material which had distinct commonalities (which is invariably the safe route to travel when undertaking a circuitous and perhaps precarious voyage of this nature). We also know of the existence of lists of “Yeshua Sayings” for Rav Shaul alludes to their actuality by remarking “remembering the words the Lord Yeshua himself said.” These things were “said.” They were oral traditions. They were not originally “written down” until much later. That the Messianic Rabbi drew upon one of these lists of oral traditions is self evident: “Yeshua said... 'It is more blessed to give than to receive'” (Acts 20.35).

We find another of these list-sayings preserved by Rav Shaul in 1 Cor 11.24,25 in which he purports to quote the Mashiach's statements before the “Last Supper,” using words that are similar but certainly not identical to those recorded by Luke (Lk 22.19,20). Again, Rav Shaul's physician records another saying in Luke 6.5 – a saying which appears in a single ms and which records the following statement made by Yeshua to a man found deliberately performing work on the Sabbath day. Yeshua says, “Friend, if you know what you are doing, you are blessed; but if you do not, you are accursed as a breaker of the Law [Torah]” which is an interesting comment indeed, considering the times in which he lived and the immediate context of Luke 6 in which the rejected text appears.

(I am not suggesting the latter text is legitimate, I am merely pointing out the existence of “Agrapha.” In scholarly circles these unknown sayings attributed to Yeshua are called “the Agrapha” (Gk, meaning “unwritten things”).

There exist more Agrapha in the Syriac Didascalia. In this document we find the saying of Yeshua, “A man is unapproved, if he be untempted” (Didasc. Syr., II, 8]. Agrapha can also be located in the writings of Jerome: “In the Gospel which the Nazarenes are accustomed to read, that according to the Hebrews [the Gospel According to the Hebrews], there is put among the greatest crimes he who shall have grieved the spirit of his brother” (Jerome, Ezech., xviii, 7): In the same Gospel (Jerome, Eph., v, 3 sq.): “In the Hebrew Gospel too we read of the Lord saying to the disciples: And never, said he, rejoice, except when you have looked upon your brother in love.” Again, located in Apostolic Church-Order, 26: “For he said to us before, when he was teaching: That which is weak shall be saved through that which is strong.” In Acta Philippi, 34: “For the Lord said to me: Except you make the lower into the upper and the left into the right, you shall not enter into my kingdom.” This latter statement is referring, of course, to the repentance expected of humankind from God the Father. It involves a complete turn around to face another direction.

Traditional sources of Agrapha are also to be located in the following Patristic writings.

Justin Martyr: “Wherefore also our Lord Jesus Christ said, In whatsoever things I apprehend you, in those I shall judge you” (Dial. 47).

Clement of Alexandria: “For ask, he says for the great things, and the small shall be added to you” (Strom. I, 24, 158). “Rightly therefore the Scripture also in its desire to make us such dialecticians, exhorts us: Be approved moneychangers, disapproving some things, but holding fast that which is good” (Strom. I, 28, 177). “For not grudgingly, he says, did the Lord declare in a certain gospel: My mystery is for me and for the sons of my house” (Strom. V, 10, 64).

Origen: “But the Saviour himself says: He who is near me is near the fire; he who is far from me, is far from the kingdom” (Homil. in Jer., XX, 3).

Traditional sources of Agrapha are also to be located in the Oxyrhynchus Logia.

“Yeshua said, Except you fast to the world, you shall in no wise find the kingdom of God.”

“Yeshua said, I stood in the midst of the world, and in the flesh was I seen of them, and I found all men drunken, and none found I athirst among them, and my soul grieved over the sons of men, because they are blind in their heart, and see not.”

“Yeshua said, Wherever there are two, they are not without God; and wherever there is one alone, I say I am with him. Raise the stone and there you shall find me; cleave the wood, and there am I.”

“Yeshua said, A prophet is not acceptable in his own country, neither does a physician work cures upon them that know him.”

“Yeshua said, A city built upon the top of a hill and established can neither fall nor be hid.”

“Yeshua said, You hear with one ear...”

We have very early indications of the popularity of this Gospel for it is quoted in the writings of Hippolytus of Rome (c.222-235 CE) and Origen (c.233 CE). We must exercise extreme caution however in the case of Hippolytus for his quotations from a scroll of the same name vary distinctly from the mss we have at our fingertips. It well may be the case that he is quoting not from the Gospel of Thomas but from a fabricated work which was entitled The Infancy Gospel of Thomas. The original ms of the Gospel of Thomas remains the property of Egypt's Department of Antiquities.

Who was this Thomas?


If you would like to continue studying the lecture series “THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS” we would encourage you to become a member of the International Messianic Community of Faith (IMCF). The way to become a member is to get behind this ministry and Work of God by sharing your financial blessings as frequently as God desires of you. Our very survival depends on the generosity of our students/members.

We are not subject to any church or religious organisation of men, and are not under any authoritarian church board of any church, denomination, or sect. We are entirely free in the Mashiach Yeshua, and will not be muzzled by so-called religious pastoral “coverings.” We are not asking for a “tithe.” The paying of a Levitical tithe based on “net” or “gross” is illegal as far as God the Father, Yeshua (and the Torah) are concerned. Even though churches, and certain Messianic organisations, say they have a claim to a tithe of your increase God says the exact and precise opposite! (Please see our lecture on The Tithing Paper located under the Library header on this site.)

Please feel free to access the donation icon on the front page of this public site and send an email notifying us of your generosity and your identification so that you may be immediately admitted as a member of the International Messianic Community of Faith (IMCF).

We thank you for allowing us to serve you in this manner.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2015, 05:06:41 PM by Rebbe » Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!